March 04, 2007

At some point I got tagged and I think the tag was something about 5 things people might not know. Maybe? It was so long ago and I've forgotten. But there is attempt around some reading...

1. In graduate school I compulsively read romance novels, especially ones in a series called “Second Chance at Love” which featured divorced or widowed women meeting new men.

2. Now I compulsively read the Home & Garden sections of the New York Times and the San Francisco Chronicle


3. and also the blog apartmenttherapy.com (both the New York and the San Francisco ones, and sometimes if I’m desperate I’ll read the Los Angeles one) on the web.

I actually know what days the new sections of Home & Garden show up in the newspapers. (I have been especially excited when I have found various poets in the Times Home & Garden over the last year. Katy Lederer and Mei mei Berssenbrugge have both gotten mentions.) I have no idea why I am compulsively collecting information on how to decorate million dollar homes (in the Times and the Chronicle) and rental apartments (apartmenttherapy.com) as I live in neither. But maybe that is the point. I think this reading is related to the romance novel reading.

4. I also indulge in reading that is similar to the romance novel reading by subscribing to New Yorker, Harpers, Dwell, This Old House, Sunset, Wired, and Adbusters. I read all of these either in bath and/or before going to bed as a sort of soporific. If I get behind, I usually take a bunch on an airplane and read while traveling, leaving issues behind as I finish them.

5. Of these, the New Yorker is the only one that I have a really long relationship with. (The others change from year to year.) I have read it cover to cover (but always skipping the poetry, the fiction, the theater reviews, and most of the political analysis) since high school.

Three books I've been particularly interested in lately:

Inger Christensen's It. Finally in translation and I was totally unable to stop reading it. Stunning beginning.

Bob Perelman's Iflife. "Subject Matter" or "Iflife" has wonderful new take on poetry/essay mix.

Ron Silliman's Under Albany. Crucial reading for trying to understand how the east bay became what it is. Although all told through the details of one person. Felt the story ended too early, which is inevitable limitation of the poem's explication of previous poem. Wanted more about the east bay as it becomes what it is now, deeply beholden to the computer industry. Interesting details about poetry at the time. Attempts a certain inclusiveness to the story it tells. Is it before Grand Piano? Or at same time?
English 204
INVESTIGATIVE POETICS: a craft of poetry


Ed Sanders begins his 1976 essay “Investigative Poetry” with “There is no end / to / Gnosis: // The hunger / for / DATA.” This is a course in poetics, which means all of making, not just poetry. And while we’ll be reading a lot in poetry, we’ll also be reading political theory and popular journalism and watching some film. As it is a craft course, we will discuss the ways that writers, artists, and scholars use formal tools so as to best represent their content. In order to do this, the course will be focused around three content areas: ecology (with a special attention to the cluster of race, class and environment that defines something like Katrina), military (with a special attention to how the war with Iraq is being represented in very contemporary poetry), and the city (with a special attention to how artists and writers have translated urban theory’s attention to class). Required work includes regular responses to the reading or viewing and
three projects, one in each content area (but they can be in any genre or form).


CODE:
SPD = book available at SPD
MBS = book available at Mills bookstore
OR = online reserve, the password is eng204-s07
R = on regular reserve as of 1/14/2007

If there is no designator, you should be able to find at local bookstore and/or on web and/or on reserve. But plan ahead.


January 23

introduction

please read Ed Sanders “Investigative Poetry” as soon as you can just for some context. [OR]


first module: the MILITARY
argument: In the last five years an unusually large amount of poets have written on the same topic: US military expansionism. We will begin this class by looking at a number of these works and cataloguing the various formal techniques that these writers use.


recommended reading …

Alice Notley, Alma or the Dead Women [MBS]

Amiri Baraka, Somebody Blew up America [SPD]

Barrett Watten, Bad History [SPD & R]

Carole Mirakove, Mediated [SPD] or Carole Mirakove, Occupied [SPD]

Eliot Weinberg, “What I Heard about Iraq” [OR]

Fanny Howe, On the Ground [SPD & R]

Judith Goldman, Deathstar/Rico-chet [SPD & R]

Jules Boykoff, Once Upon a Neoliberal Rocket Badge [SPD]

Rob Fitterman & Dirk Rowntree, War, a Musical [SPD]

Judith Goldman and Leslie Scalapino, editors, War & Peace 2: Poetry and Essays [SPD & R]

Jena Osman, Essays in Astericks [SPD & R]

K. Silem Mohammad, Deer Head Nation [SPD & R]

Kent Johnson, Lyric Poetry After Auschwitz [MBS]

Kim Rosenfeld, Trama [SPD & R]

Kristin Prevallet, Shadow Evidence Intelligence [SPD & R]

Lisa Jarnot, Black Dog Songs [SPD & R]

Meg Hammell, Death Notices [SPD]

Drew Gardener, Petroleum Hat [SPD]

Linh Dinh, Borderless Bodies [SPD & R]


also, highly recommended for thinking about representational issues around the wars…
Judith Butler, Precarious Life: The Power of Mourning and Violence [MBS & R]


first assignment

Choose at least two books and prepare a ten minute presentation on these books. The goal of the presentations is to develop a list of forms, a sort of toolbox, that various authors use to discuss various wars of the last few years. And then to be able to discuss how these forms are used and how they work. For reference, read Charles Bernstein’s “Poem Profiler” [OR]. You might want to structure your presentation like this: 1. context around book; who the author is. 2. formal devises used (a listing might be easiest here). 3. what the book is “about”; what the author decides to include/exclude. 4. thoughts on how the form and content are working. Please prepare a handout that summarizes your presentation and bring copies to class. This assignment doesn’t need to be fancy but it should have some detailed information in it.


second assignment

Using the same content area (the recent wars) as your focus, write your own piece. Bring copies of this piece to class and also bring a one page discussion of what decisions you made as you
wrote the piece and why you made them.


January 30
class presentations of first assignment


February 6 @ 11: Judith Goldman will talk. Place to be announced.


February 6
class presentations of first assignment


February 13
t.b.a.


February 20
workshop of second assignment


February 27
workshop of second assignment


second module: ECOLOGY
argument: We’re witnessing an unprecedented environmental crisis. Even the oil barons are beginning to realize they have to admit this or risk looking foolish. Poetry has a long tradition of glorifying and celebrating the natural world. In recent years a field of “ecopoetics” has begun to suggest that glorification of the natural world in isolation (aka “nature poetry”) is part of the problem, not the solution. We’ll look at a wide range of work and attempt to the study the various terrains of this debate.

list number 1…
Beth Tobin, “Imperial Designs: Botanical Illustration and the British Botanical Empire.” [OR]

Jeffrey Kastner, ed. Land and Environmental Art [MBS & R]

Jonathan Skinner, editor, Ecopoetics, all 4 volumes


list number 2…:
Andrew Schelling, Wild Form and Savage Grammar [SPD]

Cecilia Vicuna, The Precarious: The Art and Poetry of Cecilia Vicuna [MBS & R]

Eleni Sikelianos, the California Poem [SPD & R]

Gary Snyder, any titles [at any bookstore & R]

Haunani-Kay Trask, Night is a Sharkskin Drum [R]

Jack Collom, Red Car Goes by: Selected Poems 1955-2000 [SPD]

James Thomas Stevens, Combing the Snakes from His Hair [MBS & R]

Kaia Sand, “Aquifer” in Interval [SPD]

Larry Eigner, any titles [SPD & R]

Lorine Niedecker, any titles [SPD & R]

Marcella Durand, Anatomy of Oil

Mary Oliver, any titles [at any bookstore; also some work on reserve]

‘Oiwi: A Native Hawaiian Journal

Ted Kooser, any titles [at any bookstore; & R]

Spurse and Rachel T. Fouladi, “Investigations in Place: Some Thoughts on Psychogeographic Mapping Strategies in an Examination of the Working Coasts of Maine” [OR]

Or, all three of these: Spike Lee, When the Levees Broke: A Requiem in Four Acts, Al Gore, An Inconvenient Truth, Luc Jacquet, March of the Penguins.


first assignment:
Maps. Choose at least work from list number 1 and at least two off of list number two and make a map of these works, representing in some form other than prose what is in these works. An inclusive definition of map should be assumed. Charts and lists, for instance, could work. I just want the works represented in some method other than prose paragraphs. And I want to get some sort of picture of the scope of the various works. Although this is mainly a content assignment, come to class prepare to talk some about the formal choices that form these works.


second assignment:
Using the same content area as your focus, make your own piece. Bring copies of this piece to class and also bring a one page or one long paragraph piece where you discuss what decisions you made as you wrote the piece and why you made them.

Bonus points for assignments that suggest that the way this class divides the military and the environment into two separate modules is also part of the problem.


March 6
class presentations of first assignment


March 13
class presentations of first assignment


March 20, spring break


March 27
workshop of second assignment


April 3
workshop of second assignment


third module: URBAN SPACES
argument: As much as the environment is in crisis, so are urban spaces. Urban space has both grown and changed so much in the last twenty years. Extreme wealth and extreme poverty side by side is becoming one of the most defining characteristics of urban areas. We’ll look at how this economic divide does and does not get represented in various works.

reading …

BitterWeber, Live Like This, especially section on the Mecca (should be done with the Brooks poems) [MBS]

George Packer, “The Megacity: Decoding the Chaos of Lagos” [OR]

Gwendolyn Brooks, from A Street in Bronzeville [OR] & Gwendolyn Brooks, from In the Mecca (should be done with BittnerWeber piece) [OR]

Fiamma Montezemolo, Rene Peralta, and Heriberto Yepez, Here is Tijuana!

Inger Christensen, It [“Prologos” is OR but should read entire book]

Jeff Derksen, Transnational Muscle Cars [MBS & R]

Joshua Clover, The Totality for Kids

Mark Nowak, Shut Up Shut Down [MBS & R]

Mike Davis, “Fear and Money in Dubai” [OR]

Mike Davis, Planet of the Slums or NLR article [OR]

Renee Gladman, the Activist [SPD & R]

Samuel Delany, Times Square Red Times Square Blue [MBS & R]


first and second assignment:

By this time, you should know the drill. The first assignment should be about some of these
issues/works. The second should be an enactment.


April 10
class presentations of first assignment


April 17: Joshua Clover to talk @ 11; Mills Hall 312.


April 17
class presentations of first assignment


April 24
workshop of second assignment


May 1
workshop of second assignment

English 270
exPEERiMENTAL: a poetry workshop



January 17
introduction


January 24 and 31
Each presenting poet submits somewhere between 1-10 pages of work to be discussed. This exercise probably works best if this work is either a single poem or a connected series of poems.

Mapping poets in the workshop are to make some sort of map or chart of the work of the presenting poets. By map I mean some sort of visual representation that might help the author to resee what they are doing. I’ve given you some examples on the online reserve for this class from Helen Vendler’s close readings of Shakespeare’s sonnets but there are many ways to do this assignment, so find your own way. Bring in 10 copies of each map you make.


January 24
poetone presenting, poets two and seven mapping
poettwo presenting, poets three and eight mapping
poetthree presenting, poets six and one mapping
poetfive presenting, poets eight and nine mapping


January 31
poetsix presenting, poets seven and two mapping
poetseven presenting, poets five and ten mapping
poeteight presenting, poets one and six mapping
poetnine presenting, poets ten and five mapping
poetten presenting, poets nine and three mapping


February 7 and 21
Each participant will bring in some work, somewhere between 1-10 pages, that either needs more or needs less. Respondents will then either cut ten things from the work and discuss why they did this. Or they will make a list of ten things they would add to the work and discuss why. Respondents decide whether to cut or add, not authors. Respondents should bring in 10 copies of their response.

February 7
poetten, poetone cutting or adding
poetnine, poettwo cutting or adding
poeteight, poetthree cutting or adding
poetseven, poeteight cutting or adding


February 13
t.b.a.


February 21
poetsix, poetfive cutting or adding
poetfive, poetsix cutting or adding
poetthree, poetseven cutting or adding
poettwo, poetnine cutting or adding
poetone, poetten cutting or adding


February 28 and March 7
Participants are to bring in some work, however many pages that they find most appropriate at this moment. And with their work they should submit copies of some other piece of writing by someone else--an essay (a short one or an excerpt from a longer essay) or a poem or a news article or something that they feel illuminates or gives another perspective to their work. They should also fill out and submit one of Robert Duncan’s influence maps for their work as a whole (not just the work they are submitting).

Each participant in the workshop is to respond by supplying copies of some other piece of writing (or an excerpt from this writing) by someone else that they feel illuminates or gives another perspective to the poet’s work and also a paragraph where they explain why they chose the piece they chose. Participants should bring in 10 copies of both the suggested piece of writing and their response. (This assignment stolen from comments made by Laurel deCou and Elizabeth Anderson.)


February 28
poetone presenting, poetfive suggesting additional reading
poettwo presenting, poetone suggesting additional reading
poetthree presenting, poetten suggesting additional reading
poetfive presenting, poettwo suggesting additional reading


March 7
poetsix presenting, poetthree suggesting additional reading
poetseven presenting, poetnine suggesting additional reading
poeteight presenting, poetseven suggesting additional reading
poetnine presenting, poetsix suggesting additional reading
poetten presenting, poeteight suggesting additional reading


March 14 and March 28
Bring in a big chunk of your work. Around thirty pages. Maybe more. Respondents are to go through this work and create an index or glossary or outline. This index or glossary should be creative and illuminative, not merely representative. See the Thalia Field and Joshua Clover examples on online reserve. Respondents should bring in 10 copies of their index or whateva. (This assignment stolen from comments by Jacob Eichert.)


March 14
poetone presenting, poetsix indexing
poettwo presenting, poetfive indexing
poetthree presenting, poettwo indexing
poetfive presenting, poetthree indexing
poetsix presenting, poetten indexing


March 21
spring break


March 28
poetseven presenting, poetone indexing
poeteight presenting, poetnine indexing
poetnine presenting, poeteight indexing
poetten presenting, poetseven indexing


April 4
t.b.a.


April 11 and 18
Because everyone should know everyone’s work by now, we will this time around just respond to it. Each respondent is to design an “experiment” or a “process” or an “exercise” or some sort of “machine” that should produce a poem in the style of the poets to whom they are responding. The exercises should be doable and also works of art in themselves. They might also function as gifts. I would suggest reading Jackson MacLow’s “Make Your Own Experiment” and also the Bernadette Mayer and Charles Bernstein experiments lists for inspiration. Again, bring in 10 copies.


April 11
poetone responds to poetthree and poeteight
poettwo responds to poetten and poetseven
poetthree responds to poetnine and poetfive
poetfive responds to poetseven and poetone


April 18
poetsix responds to poeteight and nine
poetseven responds to poetsix and poettwo
poeteight responds to poetfive and poetten
poetnine responds to poetone and poetthree
poetten responds to poettwo and poetsix


April 25 and May 2
I’m still figuring this out due to date miscalculation. At some point, I’d like to have a discussion about what sorts of feedback might be useful for you.

Blog Archive